• Users Online: 1102
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT COMPETITION
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 36

CRC3: Biomechanics of implant in prosthetic dentistry


Date of Web Publication31-Oct-2018

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.244657

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
. CRC3: Biomechanics of implant in prosthetic dentistry. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18, Suppl S1:36

How to cite this URL:
. CRC3: Biomechanics of implant in prosthetic dentistry. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 20];18, Suppl S1:36. Available from: http://www.j-ips.org/text.asp?2018/18/5/36/244657



Shabab Ahmed Khan1, Jayeeta Saha2, Divya Kumari1

1Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital Gandhi Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna 800020, India

2Sonarpur, Kolkata 700150, West Bengal, India

Introduction: Dental implants have become the most popular form of restorative dentistry for normal function, aesthetics, speech and health. A fundamental criterion to determine success of an implant surgery is the fast and stable implant Osseo integration; which is the formation of a direct structural and functional connection between the implant and supporting tissues.

Case Report: The patient, a 25-year-old male, non-smoker in good general health, presented with a missing tooth #47. History revealed that the tooth was extracted due to failed endodontic treatment and was currently replaced with a removable partial denture. Radiographic and clinical examination revealed that bone volume was adequate in all dimensions. As the patient wanted a fixed restoration, options were discussed including an option of a conventional fixed bridge, bonded Maryland type-bridge or an implant retained crown. An implant was the preferred treatment option.

Discussion: Biomechanics compromises all kinds of interaction between tissues of the body and the forces acting on them; including the responses of the biologic tissues to the applied loads. Calculating the effective firmness from homogenization of peri-implant tissues appears to be a reliable approach to predict implant stability. However, the structure-biomechanical relationship always remained a clinical challenge.

Conclusion: In the early years of treating patient with osseointegrated dental implants, we underestimated the importance of biomechanics and the limitations of the systems that were available. A thorough biomechanical planning not only would confirm the suitability of the treatment, but also prove beneficial in avoiding the litigious risk.






 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed30    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]