• Users Online: 1017
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT NON-COMPETITION
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 49-50

CRNC11: One-Year follow-up of a maxillary first molar restored with a endocrown


Date of Web Publication31-Oct-2018

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.244582

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
,. CRNC11: One-Year follow-up of a maxillary first molar restored with a endocrown. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18, Suppl S1:49-50

How to cite this URL:
,. CRNC11: One-Year follow-up of a maxillary first molar restored with a endocrown. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 20];18, Suppl S1:49-50. Available from: http://www.j-ips.org/text.asp?2018/18/5/49/244582



Jin Lin Wong, Chong Lin Chew

Division of Graduate Dental Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Introduction: Endocrown is an alternative restorative option for endodontically treated teeth with significant loss of coronal structure. It is a 1-piece restoration that uses the pulp chamber for retention by means of adhesive cementation. This approach is gaining popularity and various materials have been reported.

Case Description: A 72 years old Chinese female presented with a heavily restored and endodontically treated maxillary right first molar. The tooth was given a guarded prognosis due to the loss of substantial tooth structure. The decision was made for an endocrown as opposed to the conventional method of crown lengthening surgery followed by a cast-post-core and crown. Crown lengthening was contraindicated given the short roots and close proximity of the root furcation to the crestal bone. The endocrown was fabricated using monolithic zirconia and cemented with resin cement using the adhesive technique. There were no complications reported during the review appointments.

Discussion: Endocrown is a single monoblock restoration consisting of a intraradicular post, core and crown. It allows for the conservation of tooth structure and also a reduced clinical time. Retention of the crown is obtained via macroretention by engaging the internal wall of the pulp chamber and the crown preparation margins while micro-retention is achieved with the use of adhesive cements.

Conclusion: The patient was satisfied with the treatment outcome. At one-year follow-up, the endocrown is still functional and in good condition. Endocrowns may be considered as a feasible treatment option for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth with compromised tooth structure. However, stringent case selection is necessary.






 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed30    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]