• Users Online: 529
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 87

40. Efficacy of mandibular 2-implant overdenture: an updated meta-analysis on patient-based outcomes


King George’s Medical University, Lucknow

Date of Web Publication30-Nov-2018

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.246713

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Singh BP. 40. Efficacy of mandibular 2-implant overdenture: an updated meta-analysis on patient-based outcomes. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18, Suppl S2:87

How to cite this URL:
Singh BP. 40. Efficacy of mandibular 2-implant overdenture: an updated meta-analysis on patient-based outcomes. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 14];18, Suppl S2:87. Available from: http://www.j-ips.org/text.asp?2018/18/6/87/246713



Aim: To provide an update on the existing. Evidence from randomized controlled. Trials assessing the efficacy of. The mandibular 2-implant overdenture. In regard to patient-based outcomes.. Methodology: electronic searches were carried out. To september 2015 through medline,. Embase, the cochrane central register. Of controlled trials, and the cochrane. Systematic reviews. Only randomized. Controlled trials that compared conventional. Dentures with mandibular. 2-implant overdentures were included.. Patient-based outcomes were assessed,. Including patient satisfaction and oral. Health– and general health–related. Quality of life. Random effects models. Were used to pool the effect sizes of. All included studies. . Result: a random effects model. Showed that, when compared with. Conventional dentures, mandibular. 2-implant overdentures significantly. Improved patient satisfaction (pooled. Effect size = 0.87, z = 5.31, 95%. Confidence interval: 0.55 to 1.19,. P < 0.0001, ?2 = 41.82, df = 8, p <. 0.0001, i2 = 81%) and oral health–. Related quality of life (pooled effect. Size = –0.66, z = 2.72, 95% confidence. Interval: –1.13 to –0.18, p = 0.007,. ?2 = 21.26, df = 4, p = 0.0003, i2 =. 81%). . Knowledge transfer statement: this. Meta-analysis shows that mandibular. 2-implant overdentures are significantly. More satisfactory to the general edentate. Populations than new conventional. Dentures. The results also show that. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures. Provide significantly better oral health–. Related quality of life than do new. Conventional dentures. These results. Should be shared with edentate patients. In planning their treatment.






 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed24    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded9    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]