|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 324-331
Comparison of expectation and satisfaction among new and existing denture wearers and correlation of duration of previous denture-wearing experience to satisfaction in completely edentulous patients: A pilot study
Deepa Subramanian, Raj Tilak Govindarajulu, Vinod Narayanan, Nandhini Devi Kalimuthu
Department of Prosthodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospitals, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||29-Apr-2019|
|Date of Decision||09-Jun-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||23-Sep-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||10-Oct-2019|
Dr. Deepa Subramanian
Department of Prosthodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospitals, Sulur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the patients' expectation and satisfaction with complete dentures before and after the treatment concerning retention, mastication, phonetics, esthetics, and comfort among the first-time denture wearers and already denture wearers and to find the correlation between duration of denture-wearing experience and satisfaction.
Settings and Design: Cross sectional survey .
Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was given to the patient before the onset of the treatment, and ratings were given by the patient for expectation regarding retention, mastication, phonetics, esthetics, and comfort. Patient-related variables regarding previous denture experience and duration of wearing were also recorded. After the treatment was completed, the patient was asked to complete the same questionnaire to assess the satisfaction.
Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics, frequency and percentage analysis, Wilcoxon signed- rank test, Mann–Whitney U-test.
Results: Expectation and satisfaction were met for all the variables except mastication (P = 0.004) for first-time wearers and except mastication (P = 0.001) and comfort (P = 0.007) among existing denture wearers. However, no significant correlation was elicited between patient expectation and satisfaction in both these groups as the overall mean satisfaction percentage was similar. A clinical significance of P = 0.037 was seen with respect to the duration of denture-wearing experience among existing wearers. Regression model analysis showed a decreased satisfaction with increased duration of wearing (r = 0.396).
Conclusions: Satisfaction and expectation were found to be almost the same irrespective of whether they are first-time wearers or existing wearers. With the increase in the duration of denture-wearing experience, the satisfaction of the patients decreased.
Keywords: Denture satisfaction, duration of wearing, expectation
|How to cite this article:|
Subramanian D, Govindarajulu RT, Narayanan V, Kalimuthu ND. Comparison of expectation and satisfaction among new and existing denture wearers and correlation of duration of previous denture-wearing experience to satisfaction in completely edentulous patients: A pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019;19:324-31
|How to cite this URL:|
Subramanian D, Govindarajulu RT, Narayanan V, Kalimuthu ND. Comparison of expectation and satisfaction among new and existing denture wearers and correlation of duration of previous denture-wearing experience to satisfaction in completely edentulous patients: A pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 7];19:324-31. Available from: http://www.j-ips.org/text.asp?2019/19/4/324/268767
| Introduction|| |
The success of prosthodontic treatment in geriatric patients is based on the general health as well as an array of dental and nondental factors. Among the nondental factors, patient satisfaction has a vital role. With accurate diagnosis and strict protocol, patient satisfaction would ensure long-term clinical results. Patient satisfaction should be given utmost importance as Devan stated appropriately that the dentist had to meet the mind of the patient before he meets the mouth of the patient. Dentist–patient communication plays an important role in satisfaction. The aim of a dentist would be not only to achieve function but also satisfaction which can be affected by various factors such as medical, functional, and psychological statuses. Thus, caring for edentulism in older patients poses a great challenge. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the expectation of a completely edentulous patient was met pertaining to factors such as retention, esthetics, mastication, phonetics, and comfort after receiving the conventional dentures. Further, this study also considered the effect of previous denture-wearing experience along with duration on patient satisfaction.
Factors attributing to patient satisfaction would be dependent on the dentist as well as the patient. From the dentist point, it included dentist–patient relationship, quality of advanced treatment options given, interpersonal communication, getting informed consent, and cost of the treatment. Factors related to the patient included quality of life affected by factors such as eating, smooth communication, physical comfort, loneliness, job, hobbies, meaningfulness, social life, and economic status. Besides, it also included the dental conditions such as adhesion and cohesion, viscosity and flow of saliva, the shape and degree of resorption of alveolar ridges, quality and quantity of alveolar bone as well as mineral density, resiliency of soft tissue, relationship between the upper and lower alveolar ridges, neuromuscular coordination, status of oral mucosa, depth of vestibular sulcus, and presence of hypertrophy of the tongue.
In a number of studies conducted over the past 30 years, the proportion of full denture patients who were dissatisfied with new and well-made prostheses was between 10% and 15%. It was found that the degree of satisfaction decreased during the first few years after insertion. Studies by Fenlon and Sherriff concluded that the initial quality of complete dentures at insertion was not a significant factor in determining patient's satisfaction with and use of these dentures 2 years after insertion. Furthermore, quality of mandibular residual ridges, retention and stability of mandibular dentures, accuracy of reproduction of retruded jaw relationship, and patient adaptability were powerful determinants of patient satisfaction.
Sharafat et al. reported that the attitude toward wearing of a denture can be used as a prospective tool to measure satisfaction. Studies have shown that submandibular/sublingual salivary flow rate helped clinicians to predict denture satisfaction. Berg found that deterioration in overall satisfaction was mainly a reflection of patient opinion of the mandibular denture. Elderly females were less satisfied with conventional dentures than elderly males with respect to esthetics and ability to chew. This was proposed due to factors such as hormonal alterations, blood pressure, and psychological factors. Studies have also been conducted to assess satisfaction levels if influenced by fabrication techniques such as using different neutral zone concepts.
Earlier studies in the scientific literature aimed at finding the satisfaction after the treatment in completely edentulous patients. Nevertheless, expectation before the treatment was not evaluated. In addition, a comparison between first-time wearers and already denture wearers was not elicited which might be also an important factor in achieving patient satisfaction. Further, the duration of denture-wearing experience was not correlated with satisfaction. Hence, a study was planned to correlate the expectation of the edentulous patients before treating them and satisfaction after the treatment is done, i.e., after giving conventional dentures for first-time wearers and existing denture wearers and to find whether the duration of previous denture-wearing experience affects the level of satisfaction.
| Materials and Methods|| |
An observational analytical cross-sectional pilot study was planned to be conducted for patients receiving conventional complete dentures with a follow-up period of 3 months in the Department of Prosthodontics, RVS Dental College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. The study was approved by institutional review board. Fifty completely edentulous patients who sought prosthodontic treatment in the month of January 2019 were allocated for the study. It was a method of convenience sampling. They were divided into two groups as first-time denture wearers and existing denture wearers. The samples were chosen based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were (1) patients with both jaws edentulous ( first-time denture wearers and already denture wearers who needed a new pair of dentures), (2) patients of both the sexes, (3) patients of all ages between 38 and 70 years, and (4) patients who were able to understand and respond to the questionnaire used in the study. The exclusion criteria were (1) medically compromised patients, (2) patients suffering from psychological and neurological disorders, (3) systemic diseases, (4) patients suffering from acute or chronic symptoms of temporomandibular disorders, and (5) patients who had undergone jaw surgeries for trauma, cancer, etc. Prior permission was obtained for the study from the Institutional Ethical Review Board.
Informed consent was obtained from the patients, and they were all aware that they participated in a study. All the procedures performed in the study were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of medical investigation involving human subjects given in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013. Before the onset of the treatment, all the patients included in the study were given a questionnaire to be filled by them. The patients' expectation regarding the prostheses in terms of retention, mastication, phonetics, esthetics, and comfort was recorded in the questionnaire along with the previous denture-wearing experience. Both the wearers and nonwearers were questioned in their own mother tongue.
The grading was rated with the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) using the optimum cutoff values. The Verbal Descriptive Scale (VDS) was used as the categorical criteria for VAS. To standardize, both expectation and satisfaction were rated using VDS which was based on VAS.
Conventional removable complete dentures were fabricated for all the patients in the study group by the staff (two prosthodontists involved in the study) in the department of prosthodontics using the same heat cure denture base resin material. Standardization of the clinical procedures for all the patients was done by mutual checking of all the clinical steps by both the prosthodontists. All the laboratory steps for fabrication were done by a dental technician under their supervision. After the dentures were delivered to the patients, they were all reviewed for postinsertion adjustments. All the patients were then recalled after 3 months. The same questionnaire was given to them, and now, the patients' satisfaction after the treatment completion was recorded. The results were then statistically analyzed.
The collected data were analyzed with IBM SPSS statistics software 23.0 version (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). To describe about the data, descriptive statistics frequency analysis, percentage analysis were used for categorical variables and the mean and standard deviation were used for continuous variables.. A significant difference between the bivariate samples in paired groups (expectation and satisfaction) was evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and for independent groups (previous denture wearers and nonwearers), the Mann–Whitney U-test was used. To assess the influence of duration of denture with mean satisfaction score, the linear regression model was used with the scatter plot. To find the significance in categorical data, the Chi-square test was used. Similarly, if the expected cell frequency is <5 in 2 × 2 tables, then the Fisher's exact test was used. In all the above statistical tools, the probability value of 0.05 is considered as statistically significant level.
| Results|| |
A total of 50 edentulous patients were examined who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Among the respondents, it was found that 44% were first-time wearers and 56% were existing denture wearers [Figure 1].
The pretreatment expectation percentage of factors such as retention, mastication, esthetics, phonetics, and comfort among both the first-time wearers and the existing denture wearers is shown in [Figure 2]. The pretreatment expectation percentages were higher for retention (82.1%), mastication (92.9%), phonetics (64.3%), and comfort (67.9%) among the denture wearers than the nonwearers with statistical significant P = 0.007 < 0.01, 0.014 < 0.01, 0.003 < 0.01, and 0.001 < 0.01, respectively, except for esthetics which was statistically insignificant (P = 0.082 > 0.01) [Table 1].
|Figure 2: Graphic representation of expectation percentage among wearers and nonwearers|
Click here to view
|Table 1: Statistical analysis of expectation percentage among existing wearers and first-time wearers using the Chi-square test|
Click here to view
In all the above comparisons, it was found that the pretreatment expectation was found to be more in denture wearers than the first-time wearers. However, expectation for esthetics was not very significant among both the groups. Both the denture wearers and nonwearers had no particular expectation about esthetics.
The posttreatment satisfaction percentage of factors such as retention, mastication, esthetics, phonetics, and comfort among both the first-time wearers and the already denture wearers is shown in [Figure 3]. The posttreatment satisfaction percentage for retention, mastication, esthetics, phonetics, and comfort among the denture wearers and the nonwearers was almost the same with insignificant P = 0.201, 0.874, 0.632, 0.170, and 0.268, respectively [Table 2].
|Figure 3: Graphic representation of satisfaction percentage among wearers and nonwearers|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Statistical analysis of satisfaction percentage among existing wearers and first-time wearers using the Chi-square test|
Click here to view
It was found that in general, the expectation of the first-time wearers was found to be less than the denture wearers as determined by the Mann–Whitney test [Table 3]. In the Mann–Whitney test, the expectation of the existing wearers for retention, phonetics, and comfort was more significant followed by mastication. This showed that mastication was also an important expectation among all the factors in existing wearers. However, in contrary to the expectation, it was also the factor which was not satisfied among the existing wearers [Table 4]. Further, first-time wearers were not satisfied with retention, esthetics, phonetics, and comfort except mastication [Table 4]. Even though differences existed in numerical values for satisfaction, the overall mean satisfaction percentage was almost the same among both denture wearers and nonwearers, as shown in [Figure 4] in the Mann–Whitney test. Thus, significant results were not elicited.
|Table 3: Comparison of expectation of factors among existing wearers and first-time wearers using the Mann-Whitney test|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Comparison of satisfaction of factors among existing wearers and first-time wearers using the Mann-Whitney test|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Graphic representation of overall mean satisfaction percentage among wearers and nonwearers|
Click here to view
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate the pretreatment expectation and posttreatment satisfaction for individual factors such as retention, mastication, esthetics, phonetics, and comfort among both the groups. For first-time wearers, pretreatment expectation and satisfaction were met for factors such as retention, esthetics, phonetics, and comfort except mastication [Table 5]. For existing denture wearers, pretreatment expectation and satisfaction were met for factors such as retention, esthetics, and phonetics except mastication and comfort [Table 6]. Although difference existed in numbers, statistical significance was noticed only for mastication. More significant results were not elicited in the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
|Table 5: Comparison of satisfaction and expectation of factors in first-time denture wearers using the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests|
Click here to view
|Table 6: Comparison of satisfaction and expectation of factors in existing denture wearers using the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests|
Click here to view
The influence of duration of denture wearing with mean satisfaction score was analyzed using the linear regression model with scatter plot. With respect to the duration of denture-wearing experience among the denture wearers, it was found that there was a clinical significance of P = 0.037 [Table 7]. As the duration of denture-wearing experience increased, the satisfaction level decreased, as shown in [Figure 5].
|Table 7: ANOVA test correlating overall satisfaction with duration of denture experience among existing denture wearers|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Linear regression model with scatter plot indicating decreased satisfaction with increased duration of wearing|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Previous studies did not consider the expectations before the treatment and the duration of the denture-wearing experience. In this study, we attempted to find whether the expectations of the patients were met by the treatment done by the dentist. Patient's satisfaction has often been considered as a treatment outcome and thus with the help of a questionnaire the satisfaction was assessed. Further, it is always difficult for the dentists to treat a previous denture wearer than a first-time denture wearer. Many a times, this parameter was not taken as a significant one. This study also strived to find whether the satisfaction of a completely edentulous patient is dependent on the duration of denture wearing.
According to Sato et al., overall satisfaction was highly correlated with chewing, speech, pain, esthetics, fit, retention, and comfort. Hence, these variables were used for evaluation in the present study. The questionnaire used hence was based on these variables. The questionnaire derived from this study inquired the patients about (1) the fit of the upper and lower dentures (retention), (2) the chewing efficacy with the given dentures (mastication), (3) the appearance of the dentures in their mouth with respect to color of the teeth and the denture (esthetics), (4) the ability to speak properly (phonetics), (5) the comfort feeling of the dentures, and (6) the duration of previous denture-wearing experience in a comprehensible way.
The patient was allowed to grade the expectation and satisfaction using the four-point VDS that was based on 100-mm VAS. This was used to assess patient satisfaction as it reduces the perception difference between the patient and the dentist. VDS was used to measure the patient's perception by asking him/her to choose the most appropriate status clearly expressed in words. The responses in the four-point VDS for assessment of the satisfaction level were categorised as 0 = dissatisfied, 1 = slightly dissatisfied, 2 = slightly satisfied, and 3 = satisfied. Thus, this scaled the expectation and satisfaction level of the patients. While rating the expectation, almost all the patients rated with 3 as all the patients expected a pair of dentures with good retention, esthetics, phonetics, mastication, and comfort.
The sample groups involved all the patients which included both first-time denture wearers and existing wearers. In the present study, it was found that patients had higher expectations beforehand than satisfaction after the treatment similar to studies by Gaspar et al. It was found naturally that the pretreatment expectations were high for both the groups for almost all factors except esthetics. This might be suggestive that all patients were more anxious about the function and comfort of the dentures rather than esthetics in contrast with a study by Ellis et al. which proposed that esthetics has direct initial impact on satisfaction. The expectation percentage analyzed using the Chi-square test for the variables was found to be more significant in the denture wearers than the first-time wearers except esthetics. This might be because of the previous experiences that could have slightly influenced the patient's expectation and satisfaction. Posttreatment satisfaction was same for both the groups.
Pre-treatment expectations were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney tests between the two groups. It was found that the expectation of the existing wearers for all the factors was more except esthetics. This was because functional limitation with dentures rather than appearance made them more socially handicapped. The expectation of the first-time wearers was comparatively less than the denture wearers which might be because they are probably inexperienced. However, the satisfaction percentage was almost the same among both denture wearers and nonwearers even though differences existed in expectations.
Expectation and satisfaction for all the variables for both the groups were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Significance elicited for mastication alone among first-time denture wearers showed that the first-time wearers were not satisfied with mastication. First-time wearers probably still needed time for adaptation to the dentures. It might also be due to the fact that their perceptions regarding new CDs were not influenced by education or previous denture experience as investigated by Miranda et al.
Significance elicited for both mastication and comfort among existing wearers showed that they had difficulty in both mastication and comfort. Mastication was the important parameter that was expected among both first-time wearers and existing wearers, and it was found that it was not satisfied for both the groups. This was in accordance with the study by Celebić andKnezović-Zlatarić where the patients perceived primarily the comfort and ability to masticate as satisfaction, followed by esthetics and retention. Furthermore, for existing wearers, expectation was more, and they were difficult to be satisfied as chewing problems faced by them could have led to diminished perceived oral health that would have resulted in increase in treatment demand. The denture-wearing experience would have given them experience that affected their level of satisfaction and adaptation. The results stressed the importance of comfort without which the success rate of treating a complete denture patient will be in grave danger.
Although categorical data showed less satisfaction in terms of numbers for both the denture wearers and nondenture wearers, the mean was almost the same which implied that patient expectation and satisfaction were met. More significant results were not elicited in both the Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon tests which might be due to the smaller sample size.
Studies by van Waas et al. had shown that the past denture experience was strongly associated with satisfaction. In our present study, we had investigated the correlation of the duration of denture wearing with satisfaction using the regression model analysis. As the duration of wearing increased, the satisfaction level decreased in patients. This could be due to the critical evaluation of the denture by the patient. It might also be due to tissue changes and multiple new dentures which could make their adaptive capacity difficult. This study showed that denture-wearing experience along with the duration would be a valuable prognostic factor influencing the outcome of the successful treatment of a completely edentulous patient with conventional dentures.
However, people who are edentulous for a long period of time were often more satisfied. This was explained by Sheppard as due to the deterioration of the oral condition of the patient which in turn made the patient to accept the prostheses or get used to it. Hence, a study needs to be conducted also about the period of edentulism before the denture fabrication.
Sometimes, patients disagreed for implants even at a lower cost as the patients who came to the outpatient department were mostly dependent on daily wages or their children for their living. Hence, satisfying those patients with conventional dentures became an essential requisite. Thus, the scope of this study was to find how far the patients were satisfied with prosthetic rehabilitation by conventional dentures among the patients visiting a dental college. However, advancement in implant dentistry had now allowed a transition from conventional to implant-supported dentures. Hence, the study would become more relevant in the future if done with implant-supported dentures as the patient satisfaction was very high in implant-supported dentures than the conventional ones.
The present study had its own limitations. The sample size was around 50 edentulous patients as it was done as a pilot study. Further studies should be followed up with a larger sample size to obtain more significant results that would be clinically acceptable.
| Conclusions|| |
Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that
- The expectations of a completely edentulous patient with respect to factors such as retention, mastication, esthetics, phonetics, and comfort were satisfied irrespective of the fact whether they were first-time denture wearers or existing denture wearers
- With the increase in the duration of denture-wearing experience, the satisfaction level of the completely edentulous patients who wore conventional dentures decreased.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Van MM. Methods of procedure in a diagnostic service to the edentulous patient. J Am Dent Assoc 1942;29:1981-90.
Sondell K, Palmqvist S, Söderfeldt B. The dentist's communicative role in prosthodontic treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:666-71.
Sangappa SB. Patient satisfaction in prosthodontic treatment: Multidimensional paradigm. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2012;12:21-6.
Yoshida M, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Hiasa K. Correlation between quality of life and denture satisfaction in elderly complete denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:77-80.
Celebić A, Knezović-Zlatarić D, Papić M, Carek V, Baucić I, Stipetić J. Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:M948-53.
Carlsson GE, Otterland A, Wennström A, Odont D. Patient factors in appreciation of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:322-8.
Fenlon MR, Sherriff M. Investigation of new complete denture quality and patients' satisfaction with and use of dentures after two years. J Dent 2004;32:327-33.
Fenlon M, Sherriff M. An investigation of factors influencing patients' satisfaction with new complete dentures using structural equation modelling. J Dent 2008;36:427-34.
Sharafat AL. Assessment of the relation between patient's attitude and patient's satisfaction with complete dentures. Pak Oral Dent J 2008;28:305-8.
Wolff A, Gadre A, Begleiter A, Moskona D, Cardash H. Correlation between patient satisfaction with complete dentures and denture quality, oral condition, and flow rate of submandibular/sublingual salivary glands. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:45-8.
Berg E. A 2-year follow-up study of patient satisfaction with new complete dentures. J Dent 1988;16:160-5.
Pan S, Awad M, Thomason JM, Dufresne E, Kobayashi T, Kimoto S, et al.
Sex differences in denture satisfaction. J Dent 2008;36:301-8.
Ladha K, Gupta R, Gill S, Verma M. Patient satisfaction with complete dentures fabricated using two neutral zone techniques: A within-subject cross-over pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014;14:161-8.
Kawai Y, Ajiro H, Takeo A, Kondoh T, Ohno Y, Yamakawa A, et al
. Determination of cut off values on the 100-mm visual analogue scale to classify the satisfaction levels of complete denture wearers. Prosthodont Res Pract 2006;5:91-6.
Varshney N, Aggarwal S, Kumar S, Singh SP. Retention and patient satisfaction with bar-clip, ball and socket and kerator attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: Anin vivo
study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019;19:49-57.
] [Full text]
Sato Y, Hamada S, Akagawa Y, Tsuga K. A method for quantifying overall satisfaction of complete denture patients. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:952-7.
Chander NG. Visual analog scale in prosthodontics. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019;19:99-100.
] [Full text]
Gaspar MG, Dos Santos MB, Dos Santos JF, Marchini L. Correlation of previous experience, patient expectation and the number of post-delivery adjustments of complete dentures with patient satisfaction in a Brazilian population. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:590-4.
Ellis JS, Thomason JM, McAndrew R. A pilot study examining the effects of enhanced aesthetics on oral health related quality of life and patient's satisfaction with complete dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2010;18:116-22.
Shah RJ, Diwan FJ, Diwan MJ, Chauhan VJ, Agrawal HS, Patel GC. A study of the emotional effects of tooth loss in an edentulous Gujarati population and its association with depression. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015;15:237-43.
] [Full text]
Miranda BB, Dos Santos MB, Marchini L. Patients' perceptions of benefits and risks of complete denture therapy. J Prosthodont 2014;23:515-20.
Celebić A, Knezović-Zlatarić D. A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. J Dent 2003;31:445-51.
Dhingra S, Rajesh G, Rao A, Pai UY, Shenoy R, Pai M. Impact of occlusal support and perceived chewing ability on oral health-related quality of life among patients attending a private dental institution in India. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2017;17:15-21.
] [Full text]
van Waas MA. Determinants of dissatisfaction with dentures: A multiple regression analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:569-72.
Lewis GR. Analyses of treatment outcomes for complete dentures provided in an undergraduate teaching programme. N
Z Dent J 2000;96:50-2.
Sheppard IM, Schwartz LR, Sheppard SM. Survey of the oral status of complete denture patients. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:121-6.
Sharma AJ, Nagrath R, Lahori M. A comparative evaluation of chewing efficiency, masticatory bite force, and patient satisfaction between conventional denture and implant-supported mandibular overdenture: Anin vivo
study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2017;17:361-72.
] [Full text]
Bhat S, Chowdhary R, Mahoorkar S. Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16:182-6.
] [Full text]
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]