• Users Online: 1569
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 379-383

A multidisciplinary approach for the management of temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction


Department of Prosthodontics, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Dental College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission06-Aug-2019
Date of Decision01-Sep-2019
Date of Acceptance18-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication10-Oct-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rashmi Kishor Jaggad
Plot No: 2568, Laxminivas, Gayatrinagar, Bhavanagar - 364 001, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_284_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is one of the primary components of the complex masticatory system. Any disturbance in the joint due to congenital or acquired causes such as trauma, pathology, or functional disturbance affects the masticatory system. This case report highlights the management of condylar hypoplasia due to trauma by forceps delivery which led to TMJ dysfunction and chronic disc displacement without reduction. A combination of stabilization appliance and arthrocentesis using platelet-rich plasma along with patient education has been proved effective for the conservative management of patients with chronic disc displacement and TMJ dysfunction.

Keywords: Arthrocentesis, condylar hypoplasia, platelet-rich plasma, stabilization appliance, temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction


How to cite this article:
Jaggad RK, Patel IB, Choksi RH, Gosai KB. A multidisciplinary approach for the management of temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019;19:379-83

How to cite this URL:
Jaggad RK, Patel IB, Choksi RH, Gosai KB. A multidisciplinary approach for the management of temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 21];19:379-83. Available from: http://www.j-ips.org/text.asp?2019/19/4/379/268772




  Introduction Top


Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is any disorder that affects or is affected by deformity, disease, misalignment, or dysfunction of the temporomandibular articulation. This includes occlusal deflection of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and associated responses in musculature.[1] The incidence of disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR) has been estimated to be 2%–8% among the TMD patients.[2]

DDwoR could be acute or chronic and is frequently addressed as “Closed lock,”[3] the features being an inability to open the mouth wide to the normal range (45–50 mm) and difficulty while performing excursive movements. Chronic disc displacement should be managed conservatively by the supportive therapy and stabilization appliance. Surgical intervention is advised in case of failure to resolve pain through supportive therapy.


  Case Report Top


A 22-year-old female reported to the department of prosthodontics with the chief complaint of pain in the right ear region while chewing all kinds of food for 2.5 years. The patient had undergone extraction of all four third molars due to the same before 1.5 years, but the pain did not resolve. She had no significant medical history and family history but reported that she had been delivered through forceps delivery method. The preextraction record in the form of an orthopantamogram (OPG) was available [Figure 1]. The nature of pain was dull, continuous, located in the right TMJ region, and aggravated on chewing both soft and hard food.
Figure 1: Orthopantamogram of the patient before extraction of the third molars showing condylar hypoplasia and early arthritic changes

Click here to view


On extraoral cranial nerve examination, there was a pain while clenching the teeth (testing motor component of the trigeminal nerve). The interincisal distance was 32 mm. Muscle examination was done[4] [Table 1]. TMJ examination revealed deviation of the mandible toward the left side while opening. There was a pain during left lateral movement and protrusive movement. On palpation, both the TMJs were tender. Clicking was present in the right TMJ when the patient tried to open the mouth wide. The load test revealed pain on the initial gentle loading.
Table 1: Severity of muscle tenderness at the 1st week and 6th week

Click here to view


Intraoral examination revealed crowding of 31, 32, 33, 41, 42, and 43 [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. Enamel wear facet was present in 47. The occlusion was anterior guided Angle's Class I malocclusion with the interferences at distobuccal cusp of 17 and 32.
Figure 2: Pretreatment view of the maxillary arch

Click here to view
Figure 3: Pretreatment view of the mandibular arch

Click here to view


The investigations were carried out to exclude any systemic disease affecting the TMJ. OPG and computed tomography scan of the right and left TMJ confirmed for condylar hypoplasia and early arthritic changes [Figure 4] and [Figure 5]. Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient confirmed anterolateral disc dislocation without reduction.
Figure 4: Orthopantamogram after extraction of the third molars showing persistent arthritic changes

Click here to view
Figure 5: Computed tomography scan investigation before the treatment

Click here to view


The treatment planning included patient education and motivation, supportive therapy, stabilization appliance, and arthrocentesis of TMJ followed by an orthodontic correction.

The following steps were used to fabricate a stabilization appliance:

  1. Diagnostic casts were obtained, and a 2-mm thermoplastic sheet was vacuum formed on it [Figure 6]
  2. The patient was guided in centric relation, and anterior centric indentations were obtained by adding acrylic on the palatal aspect of the upper anterior teeth such as to increase the inter-occlusal distance by 4–6 mm so that it produces 1–1.5 mm space in the molar region [Figure 7]
  3. Now, clear acrylic was added in the posterior region while the patient is asked to close on the anterior centric indentations [Figure 8]
  4. At this step, we need to mark all the centric indentations on buccal cusp tips of the posterior teeth and incisal edge of the anterior teeth to flatten the rest of the appliance [Figure 9]
  5. The appliance was then inserted in the patient's mouth and was checked for the centric and eccentric path. The eccentric path should exclude any other path than the canine. In the present case, as 32 was an interference that is to be corrected orthodontically, the appliance had left-sided eccentric path from 32 [Figure 10]
  6. The final insertion was done, and the patient was asked to wear the appliance at least for 6 weeks [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14].


Postinsertion instructions were to wear the appliance throughout the day and night excluding the mealtimes and teethbrushing.[5] In case of exaggeration of symptoms, the patient must report back. Examination was done on follow-up at each week until 6 weeks.
Figure 6: 2-mm thermoplastic sheet vacuum formed on the maxillary cast

Click here to view
Figure 7: Anterior centric indentations obtained on the vacuum formed sheet at an increased interocclusal distance

Click here to view
Figure 8: Addition of acrylic in the posterior region

Click here to view
Figure 9: Marking the incisal edges and buccal cusp tips for flattening the rest of the appliance

Click here to view
Figure 10: Centric and eccentric path of the mutually protected occlusal scheme

Click here to view
Figure 11: Stabilization appliance – Occlusal view

Click here to view
Figure 12: Stabilization appliance – Frontal view

Click here to view
Figure 13: Stabilization appliance – Right lateral view: Note the contact of the incisal edge of the anterior teeth and buccal cusp tip of the posterior teeth in centric relation

Click here to view
Figure 14: Stabilisation appliance – Left lateral view

Click here to view


At the end of 2 weeks, arthrocentesis of both the TM joint spaces by irrigating with 50 ml of ringer lactate solution and then treating by 0.6 ml of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was performed at the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

At the end of 6 weeks, the interincisal opening was 40 mm. Pain while chewing had reduced significantly, and clicking of the right TMJ was absent. On examination of muscles and TMJ, the pain had subsided [Table 1]. The patient was then sent for orthodontic correction of her existing malocclusion.


  Discussion Top


TMJ disc displacements are the most common TMJ pathologies in the community.[2] In DDwoR, there could be an acute phase or chronic phase. In the acute phase, there could be jaw locks or catches and interferences in jaw opening, but it improves in the chronic phase. The relationship between recent-onset DDwoR and degenerative TMJ changes in adolescents and young adults has been explored. Osteoarthritis (OA) alterations were observed in 59.3% of joints with DDwoR.[6]

The treatment of DDwoR is mainly by patient education, self-motivation, and jaw exercises. Mandibular manipulation can be done in the acute phase. The chronic phase is managed by splint therapy and arthrocentesis. Correction of any occlusal discrepancy plays a vital role in the management of such dysfunction.

Linde et al.[7] performed a 6-week study on patients with DDwoR to compare the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus occusal splint therapy and concluded that flat occlusal splint therapy is better than TENS and pain reduction was 50% more in the splint group.

Minakuchi et al.[8] performed a randomized controlled evaluation of nonsurgical treatments for DDwoR and suggested that occlusal splint therapy and jaw mobilization plus self-care were significantly effective than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus self-care over a period of 8 weeks.

Schmitter et al.[9] performed a randomized control trial to study conservative therapy for DDwoR using stabilization splint and distraction splint. Their study concluded that improvement in mouth opening was found in both the groups. However, stabilization splint had significantly more successful outcome in relieving pain during function than distraction splint.

Lin et al.[10] performed a retrospective matched cohort study to compare the effect of arthrocentesis plus PRP and PRP alone for treating TMJ OA and studied that PRP significantly helps in the healing process as it is enriched with growth factors when used between the range of 0.5 and 2 ml in high concentration and high purity. Higher efficacy is obtained in relieving other symptoms such as TMD-associated headache, jaw range of motion <6 mm, myofascial pain with a referral, and pain when chewing most foods when used along with arthrocentesis.

In the present study, we have used a combination of conservative therapies that have been proved successful to relieve the symptoms of DDwoR beginning from patient education and self-regulation, stabilization splint, and arthrocentesis along with PRP injection which yielded a successful outcome by improvement in both mouth opening and pain relief during function on a follow-up period of 10 months.


  Conclusion Top


The effective management of TMJ DDwoR demands a multidisciplinary approach that must begin with conservative management by physiotherapy, jaw manipulation, occlusal appliance, correction of occlusion, arthrocentesis, and supportive therapy along with patient's self-regulation. Any aggressive intervention should be carefully planned due to the lack of long-term successful outcome in such cases.

Acknowledgement

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Department of Oral Surgery and Department of Orthodontics at AMC Dental College and Hospital for their immense support in treating the present case.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Dawson P. Functional Occlusion. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Publishing; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:453-62.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. 7th ed. Missouri: Elsevier Publishing; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Moody PM, Calhoun TC, Okeson JP, Kemper JT. Stress-pain relationship in MPD syndrome patients and non-MPD syndrome patients. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:84-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Stiesch-Scholz M, Kempert J, Wolter S, Tschernitschek H, Rossbach A. Comparative prospective study on splint therapy of anterior disc displacement without reduction. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:474-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lei J, Han J, Liu M, Zhang Y, Yap AU, Fu KY. Degenerative temporomandibular joint changes associated with recent-onset disc displacement without reduction in adolescents and young adults. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:408-13.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Linde C, Isacsson G, Jonsson BG. Outcome of 6-week treatment with transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation compared with splint on symptomatic temporomandibular joint disk displacement without reduction. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:92-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Minakuchi H, Kuboki T, Matsuka Y, Maekawa K, Yatani H, Yamashita A. Randomized controlled evaluation of non-surgical treatments for temporomandibular joint anterior disk displacement without reduction. J Dent Res 2001;80:924-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Schmitter M, Zahran M, Duc JM, Henschel V, Rammelsberg P. Conservative therapy in patients with anterior disc displacement without reduction using 2 common splints: A randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1295-303.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lin SL, Tsai CC, Wu SL, Ko SY, Chiang WF, Yang JW, et al. Effect of arthrocentesis plus platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich plasma alone in the treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: A retrospective matched cohort study (A STROBE-compliant article). Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e0477.  Back to cited text no. 10
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed222    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded76    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]