|
 
 |
| ORIGINAL ABSTRACT |
|
| Year : 2018 | Volume
: 18
| Issue : 6 | Page : 66 |
|
33. Evaluation and comparison of surface roughness levels, surface wettability, and surface configuration of commercially pure titanium surface
V Vijayshankar Yadav
Narayana Dental College and Hospital
| Date of Web Publication | 30-Nov-2018 |
Correspondence Address:
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.246643
How to cite this article:
Yadav V V. 33. Evaluation and comparison of surface roughness levels, surface wettability, and surface configuration of commercially pure titanium surface. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18, Suppl S2:66 |
How to cite this URL:
Yadav V V. 33. Evaluation and comparison of surface roughness levels, surface wettability, and surface configuration of commercially pure titanium surface. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 20];18, Suppl S2:66. Available from: https://www.j-ips.org/text.asp?2018/18/6/66/246643 |
The bonding between the living bone and the surface of the load-bearing implant is believed to be an important factor in the success of implants. A major consideration in designing implants has been to produce surfaces that promote desirable responses by the cells and tissue-contacting implants. The aim was to evaluate different methods of modification of titanium surface and to compare surface roughness levels, surface wettability, and surface configuration of various treated surfaces of commercially pure titanium. Commercially pure titanium (grade i) sheets of 0.2 mm thick and 10 3 10 mm were used. Total specimens were divided into six groups (groups a–f) according to the surface modification. And 10 samples were included in each group. Group f showed the highest mean roughness value among the tested samples of all groups (mean ra—3.231 µm). Group c showed the lowest contact angle (mean contact angle—598). Surface roughness measurement with the help of surface profilometer revealed that samples treated with blasting with alumina (50 µ) blasting followed by acid etching with 2% hydrofluoric acid showed the highest mean roughness value.
|
Search Pubmed for